Canary Club

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
competitive

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
competitive [2025/01/09 03:05] – 96.248.55.14competitive [2025/01/13 21:18] (current) – john
Line 59: Line 59:
 The structure is major suit oriented because creating a system that caters to 54 in the minors is a losing proposition. More violent minor suit patterns are handled with a 2N overcall. Also, unlike some other methods, this method keeps a double for its natural meaning; and the structure need not be changed regardless of the opponents No Trump range. The structure is major suit oriented because creating a system that caters to 54 in the minors is a losing proposition. More violent minor suit patterns are handled with a 2N overcall. Also, unlike some other methods, this method keeps a double for its natural meaning; and the structure need not be changed regardless of the opponents No Trump range.
  
-Double is penalty in direct seat. Advancer (i.e. the partner of the person taking the first action for the defensive pair) passes the double unless he has a freakish hand. A yarborough is not a freak! If third hand makes a non-pass and 2N is still available, then that call by advancer is to be treated as competitive. 3 suit is "strong".+Double is penalty in direct seat. Advancer (i.e. the partner of the person taking the first action for the defensive pair) passes the double unless he has a freakish hand. A yarborough is not a freak! If third-hand makes a non-pass and 2N is still available, then that call by advancer is to be treated as competitive.[Gabor: Like in lebensohl, with a one suiter - forcing partner for 3C, after which pass or showing the suit?] 3 suit is "strong". [Gabor: What about 2 level suit bids from advancer? For simplicity, can we say we play lebensohl after responder bid a 2 level runout (as if overcaller had bid 1N originally Yes, that sounds good)? What is the meaning of X by advancer (esp. after an artifical bid, like transfer? E.g. (1N)-X-(2\d - hearts)-X. (What would 2\h be instead of X? double is penalty, 2\h would be takeout)]
  
 In the passout seat after a 1N bid on the left, then the rules are amended as follows: In the passout seat after a 1N bid on the left, then the rules are amended as follows:
  
-If fourth hand has not passed previously, then a double shows a good hand with a one suiter. Second hand bids 2\c to get to the suit. The immediate 2h/2s/3c/3d are of the "balancing type".+If fourth hand has not passed previously, then a double shows a good hand with a one suiter. Second hand bids 2\c to get to the suit [Gabor: No paradox raises? OK, Paradox is on]. The immediate 2\h/2\s/3\c/3\d are of the "balancing type".
  
 If fourth hand has passed originally, then the double is an "action double" with a hand playable in three suits (a 4441 or 5431 type hand or if not vulnerable even a 4432 hand). Second seat can still leave it in, of course. If fourth hand has passed originally, then the double is an "action double" with a hand playable in three suits (a 4441 or 5431 type hand or if not vulnerable even a 4432 hand). Second seat can still leave it in, of course.
Line 70: Line 70:
  
 Immediate bids of 2\h, 2\s, 3\c and 3\d are natural, and limited by the fact that a double was not bid. The bids generally deny holding a second suit. Ogust responses are used when the overcall is 2\h or 2\s. Example: (1N) 2\H (P) 2N (P) ? Immediate bids of 2\h, 2\s, 3\c and 3\d are natural, and limited by the fact that a double was not bid. The bids generally deny holding a second suit. Ogust responses are used when the overcall is 2\h or 2\s. Example: (1N) 2\H (P) 2N (P) ?
-3\C - bad hand, bad suit +  * 3\C - bad hand, bad suit 
-3\D - bad hand, good suit +  * 3\D - bad hand, good suit 
-3\H - good hand, bad suit +  * 3\H - good hand, bad suit 
-3\S - good hand, good suit +  * 3\S - good hand, good suit 
-3N - Solid suit+  * 3N - Solid suit 
 + 
 +2N is to be taken as a 2 suit takeout for the minors, but if the 2N bidder later jumps into a new suit, he is showing a strong (offensively) 2 suiter with the suit named plus the next higher ranking (\cs are higher ranking than \ss). [Gabor: does it need to be a jump? E.g. 2N-3\c-3\d should be strong \d and \h, same for 2N-3\d-4\d.]No, does not need to be a jump
  
-2N is to be taken as a 2 suit takeout for the minors, but if the 2N bidder later jumps into a new suit, he is showing a strong (offensively) 2 suiter with the suit named plus the next higher ranking (\cs are higher ranking than \ss). 
 That leaves 2\c and 2\d. 2\c show \hs and (any) other suit; 2\d shows \ss and (any) other suit. Notice that \s/\h two suiters can be shown with two different bids. If the "other" suit is the other major, then the second suit shown is better (usually better means longer). That leaves 2\c and 2\d. 2\c show \hs and (any) other suit; 2\d shows \ss and (any) other suit. Notice that \s/\h two suiters can be shown with two different bids. If the "other" suit is the other major, then the second suit shown is better (usually better means longer).
 The responses to the (2\c and 2\d) overcalls are: The responses to the (2\c and 2\d) overcalls are:
 +  * Bid of the anchor suit at the two level (2\h or 2\s) promises 3 card support and is not encouraging;
 +  * Bid of the anchor suit at the three level is encouraging;
 +  * A bid of the next higher suit (2\d over 2\c, 2\h over 2\d) is semi-artificial. It asks Overcaller to bid his 5 card suit. (Usually advancer does not have 3+ in overcaller's indicated major). Overcaller shows his long suit by:
 +    * passing if the advancer has just bid it;
 +    * "rebid" his major if it's 5 cards or more
 +    * bids a "new" suit
 +  * A pass by advancer says that the artificial bid has hit a long suit in his hand and he "hates" overcaller's indicated suit.
 +  * A new suit by advancer (i.e. not a bid of the anchor major or the step bid), is constructive and natural, but not forcing.
 +  * A 2N bid by advancer tells overcaller to bid his other suit and is somewhat forward going. If advancer then bids the originally shown major, he is showing an invitational raise with just three card support.
  
-Bid of the anchor suit at the two level (2\h or 2\s) promises 3 card support and is not encouraging; +Sample auction: 
-Bid of the anchor suit at the three level is encouraging; +  * (1N) 2\c (P) ? 
-A bid of the next higher suit (2\d over 2\c, 2\h over 2\d) is semi-artificial. It asks Overcaller to bid his 5 card suit. (Usually advancer does not have 3+ in overcaller's indicated major). Overcaller shows his long suit by: +      * pass: Greatly prefers \cs to \hs and is usually weak 
- +      * 2\d: What is your 5 card suit? 
-passing if the advancer has just bid it; +      * 2\h: 3 or more \hs; not encouraging 
-"rebid" his major if it's 5 cards or more +      * 2\s: a \s suit (constructive, NF) 
-bids a "new" suit +      * 2N: tells overcaller to bid his other suit (it doesn't ask which is his longer suit - so overcaller bids his minor even if it's shorter than his major suit) 
-A pass by advancer says that the artificial bid has hit a long suit in his hand and he "hates" overcaller's indicated suit. +      * 3\c/3\d: natural (constructive, NF) 
-A new suit by advancer (i.e. not a bid of the anchor major or the step bid), is constructive and natural, but not forcing. +      * 3\h: invitational (4 card support)
-A 2N bid by advancer tells overcaller to bid his other suit and is somewhat forward going. If advancer then bids the originally shown major, he is showing an invitational raise with just three card support. +
- +
-Sample auction +
-(1N) 2c (P) ? +
-pass +
-Greatly prefers \cs to \hs and is usually weak +
-2\d +
-What is your 5 card suit? +
-2\h +
-3 or more hs; not encouraging +
-2\s +
-a \s suit +
-2N +
-tells overcaller to bid his other suit (it doesn't ask which is his longer suit - so overcaller bids his minor even if it's shorter than his major suit) +
-3\c/3\d +
-natural +
-3\h +
-invitational+
  
  
      
  
competitive.1736391954.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025/01/09 03:05 by 96.248.55.14
Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki