canary_club
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| canary_club [2017/03/20 19:48] – johnkinn | canary_club [2023/07/31 01:04] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | The Canary Club system | + | < |
| - | was devised by Paul Heitner and John Lowenthal sometime in the late 50's or | + | |
| + | ====Preface==== | ||
| + | The Canary Club system was devised by Paul Heitner and John Lowenthal sometime in the late 50's or | ||
| early 60's. There is a high level description of the system in //The Encyclopedia | early 60's. There is a high level description of the system in //The Encyclopedia | ||
| of Bridge//. | of Bridge//. | ||
| Line 29: | Line 31: | ||
| two purposes: | two purposes: | ||
| - | - This puts us more in line with what the ACBL considers legal. The 1N response to 1D being treated as forcing is unique to this system, I believe, but probably causes no " | + | - This puts us more in line with what the ACBL considers legal. The 1N response to 1\D being treated as forcing is unique to this system, I believe, but probably causes no " |
| - Theoretically it probably is superior as well since it causes the hand which is more likely to be balanced to be declarer. | - Theoretically it probably is superior as well since it causes the hand which is more likely to be balanced to be declarer. | ||
| Line 42: | Line 44: | ||
| is a problem or not. | is a problem or not. | ||
| + | < | ||
| ==== Basis of the System ==== | ==== Basis of the System ==== | ||
| Line 49: | Line 52: | ||
| | < | | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| ===Opening Bids=== | ===Opening Bids=== | ||
| Line 82: | Line 86: | ||
| |17+HCP | 1\c|| | |17+HCP | 1\c|| | ||
| + | < | ||
| ===Principle of Canapé=== | ===Principle of Canapé=== | ||
canary_club.1490039295.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/07/31 01:16 (external edit)